This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release


My report:

> | HPUX: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-01/msg01251.html

JDA's report:
> | http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-01/msg00881.html

On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 02:49:15AM +0100, Gabriel Dos_Reis wrote:
> JDA, please could you tell us which version you used in your testing
> (I can't find it in the result you sent).  Or do you have a chance to
> confirm/infirm the results obtained by Joe by running the binutils
> tool set?

I think that the word you're looking for is "refute".

And the easiest way to refute it is by noting that the JDA result is for
hppa-unknown-linux-gnu, a different target.  Whoops!  I got confused
because JDA posted some 3.3 tests for hppa-hpux, I didn't see lets of
weak-symbol failures in that test, and I managed to pick the wrong target.
I vaguely recall a report that support for weak symbols on HPUX has
been improved for 3.3, though I don't see any mention of this on
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.3/changes.html .


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]