This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: RFC: Named warnings
> Implementationwise, I haven't yet figured out whether enums or strings
> would be better here - one can make compelling arguments for either.
> I also want to be performance-aware, which encourages making flag tests
> before function calls, although I hope there are few warning tests in
> critical code paths.
In theory, it should be no worse than -Wall (er, one that really
enabled all warnings, of course).