This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: RFC: Named warnings
- From: dewar at gnat dot com (Robert Dewar)
- To: dewar at gnat dot com, neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, shebs at apple dot com
- Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 16:42:46 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: RFC: Named warnings
> I didn't say that. I said more of our warnings should be errors. The
> example I gave was
OK, well if you are restricting this to warnings about extensions, we of
course have complete freedom to define them the way we want, though any
change in the implentation should be reflected in the documentation.
The mere fact that code is nonsensical does not mean that you can give
an error, if it is something that the standard does not proscribe.