This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: RFC: Named warnings
- From: dewar at gnat dot com (Robert Dewar)
- To: dewar at gnat dot com, neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, shebs at apple dot com
- Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 16:37:56 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: RFC: Named warnings
> No, an implementor can add as many warnings as she wants. The standards
> only dictate what must be diagnosed.
>
> Regardless, what has that to do with my post?
I was responding to the comment that some warnings should be made into errors.
That is not a transformation that is up to the individual implementor.