This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Speed regression from 3.2 to 3.3

From: Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot com>
To: Matt Austern <austern at apple dot com>
Cc: "Andrea 'fwyzard' Bocci" <fwyzard at inwind dot it>, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, Pop Sébastian <pop at gauvain dot u-strasbg dot fr>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 11:22:45 -0800
Subject: Re: Speed regression from 3.2 to 3.3
References: <5.2.0.9.2.20030122184048.01a3bfa0@popmail.libero.it> <D719A8A4-2E33-11D7-B5DE-00039390D9E0@apple.com>

On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 10:03:41AM -0800, Matt Austern wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 09:42 AM, Andrea 'fwyzard' Bocci 
> wrote:
> 
> > At 15.30 21/01/2003 -0800, Matt Austern wrote:
> >> What I see from the time report is pretty much what I said before: the
> >> parser and the gc have gone up dramatically, nothing else matters.
> >> I'm attaching a graph, for those who are interested.
> >
> > From your graph, it looks like GC times went back to a good shape in 
> > 3.4.
> > Suggestions ?
> 
> That's sure what it looks like.  I'm sure that's an important clue, but 
> I don't
> know what it means either.

Just a guess:
It's probably because of Mark's new C++ parser.  If it's faster, that's
great news.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Speed regression from 3.2 to 3.3
  - From: Matt Austern

References:
- Re: Speed regression from 3.2 to 3.3
  - From: Andrea 'fwyzard' Bocci
- Re: Speed regression from 3.2 to 3.3
  - From: Matt Austern

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]