This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: New regressions

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: mark at codesourcery dot com
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2003 16:26:28 -0500
Subject: Re: New regressions
References: <200301062112.h06LCaL20636@gandalf.codesourcery.com>

On Mon, 6 Jan 2003 13:12:36 -0800, Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrote:

> I'm seeing new regressions on i686-pc-linux-gnu for these tests:
>
>   FAIL: g++.law/refs3.C (test for excess errors)
>   FAIL: g++.law/refs4.C (test for excess errors)
>   FAIL: g++.law/refs4.C  Execution test
>   FAIL: g++.other/crash33.C (test for excess errors)
>
> I'm betting this comes from this check-in:
>
>   2003-01-02  Jason Merrill  <jason@redhat.com>
>
> 	  * call.c (build_conditional_expr): Stabilize lvalues properly.
>
> since the code in each case has ternary conditional expressions
> returning references.

A reasonable guess, but I don't think so, as that patch only affects the
extension that allows you to leave out the middle operand.  It might be my
fold patch, though; I'll investigate.

Jason

References:
- New regressions
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]