This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c++ "with" keyword
- From: dewar at gnat dot com (Robert Dewar)
- To: dewar at gnat dot com, gmariani at chaincast dot com
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2003 21:55:09 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: c++ "with" keyword
> You talk about binary compatability. I'm more concerned about source
> compatability however there are issues with binary compatability as well
> - in the case, use of enums or typedefs in a class may cause binary
> issues. Think a little harder, they are there.
No, I am talking *entirely* about source compatibility, obviously you can't
expect binaries to be compatible if you go changing the members in a struct
(think of space required for example).
You apparently have misread everything I said
> I've given examples. They still stand.
No, you have not given any realistic example of the library situation which
worries you so much.