This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: darwin & libgcj ?

From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
To: Andreas Tobler <toa at pop dot agri dot ch>
Cc: Andreas Tobler <a dot tobler at pop dot agri dot ch>, GCC <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2003 11:00:48 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: Re: darwin & libgcj ?
References: <3E1697DF.9070706@pop.agri.ch><15894.47562.872238.117780@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com><3E16BB89.5080709@pop.agri.ch>

Andreas Tobler writes:
 > Andrew Haley wrote:
 > > Andreas Tobler writes:
 > >  > Can we enable libgcj on powerpc-darwin by default?
 > >  >  > It builds with no problems out of the box with --enable-libgcj on both 
 > >  > 3.3 and trunk.
 > >  >  > Any objections?
 > > 
 > > Testsuite results would be nice.  I don't want it built if it doesn't
 > > work.
 > 
 > Well, I agree here. I build it since a longer time. But unfortunately 
 > the results look pretty bad due to a multiple definition of read. Expect 
 > gets confused and dropps the test:

Is this some weirdness in the darwin implementation of DSOs?  We
redefine all sorts of things in libgcj, not just that one.

Andrew.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: darwin & libgcj ?
  - From: Andreas Tobler
- Re: darwin & libgcj ?
  - From: Andreas Tobler
- Re: darwin & libgcj ?
  - From: Geoff Keating

References:
- darwin & libgcj ?
  - From: Andreas Tobler
- darwin & libgcj ?
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: darwin & libgcj ?
  - From: Andreas Tobler

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]