This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: GCC still getting a lot slower


> On 02-Jan-2003, Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz> wrote:
> > 
> > For C performance I think it can be practical to just benchmark linux
> > kernel build - it is fixed piece as it does not include any external
> > headers, large enought to make measurements hopefully stable enought and
> > tests performance of "usual hand writen C program" that (for C) is about
> > the most important.
> 
> The trouble is, which version?
> The Linux kernel itself is not stable.  To make a useful benchmark,
> you need to pick a specific version of the Linux kernel.
> 
> Old versions of the Linux kernel don't work with current versions of GCC,
> and probably current versions of the Linux kernel won't work with future
> versions of GCC.
Yes, but I think there is large enought overlap to make the measurements
usefull.  In casee we are interested in compilation speed only, we can
simply fix new syntax errors.

Honza
> 
> -- 
> Fergus Henderson <fjh@cs.mu.oz.au>  |  "I have always known that the pursuit
> The University of Melbourne         |  of excellence is a lethal habit"
> WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh>  |     -- the last words of T. S. Garp.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]