This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Generated unique labels

From: James Buchanan <jamesbuch at iprimus dot com dot au>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 11:43:36 +1100
Subject: Re: Generated unique labels
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20021230031449.009ec6a0@pop.iprimus.com.au><5.1.0.14.0.20021230031449.009ec6a0@pop.iprimus.com.au>

This means a different label syntax for different assembler languages
doesn't it?  So the function needs to know an "assembly context"
depending on what the target CPU is for the program.

At 04:25 PM 1/2/2003 -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:

On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 03:31:30AM +1100, James Buchanan wrote:
> Has this been done yet?  If not has anyone been assigned to it?

No and no.  Best option is to use assembler local labels.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Generated unique labels
  - From: Jonah

References:
- Re: Generated unique labels
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]