This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: Linux Number Crunching: Benchmarking Compilers and Languages on ia32


> It's the last bit, "superior intrinsic implementations of trigonometric
> functions" that strikes me as unlikely. Can you provide more information
> on this, with specific C++ code and generated asm, so that the GNU C++
> developers can see what is going on here, or how you reached these
> conclusions? I know that Gaby and Roger Sayle did some work/patching in
> this area, so if there are still issues I'd like to see them fixed
> soonish.

I based the statement above on experience from a couple of years ago, where
gcc did not emit solid code for intrinsic trigonometric functions.

I'll generate assembly-language output for both compilers, and see what
they're actually producing. That'll have to come later today or tongight, as
my plate overfloweth at the moment...

..Scott


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]