This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Planning for the Autoconf 2.5x transition?


> > 1. Make all directories have configure.in scripts which work
> > correctly with *both* 2.13 and 2.5x, then switch over.

>I would prefer this scheme.

I think this way lies continued stalemate. I don't see how both can be
made to work, and, if this cannot be accomplished (we have attempted
this for libstdc++), I'd rather have things work sanely with autoconf
2.5.x. It is an incredible inconvenience for me to not be able to use
the default autotools on RH 8 for libstdc++ work: because of this, I'm
motivated to get this working for libstdc++ as soon as possible.

I think a much saner approach is to take the target subdirs on a case by
case basis. 

Are all the target libs able to auto-gen configure/Makefiles with the
exact same autoconf/automake at the moment? That would surprise me. 

-benjamin


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]