Re: How to prevent multilib builds if OS support missing?

[Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>]

On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 08:12:39PM +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> is there some mechanism to prevent a gcc build from failing because
> some multilibbed library cannot be built due to missing OS support
> (missing libraries, binutils support etc.)?
> 
> I had thought that code in config-ml.in could be used for that purpose,
> e.g. there is sparc code with the comment:
>   # We will not be able to create libraries with -m64 if
>   # we cannot even link a trivial program.  If usually
>   # indicates the 64bit libraries are missing.
> which subsequently disables the -m64 multilib builds.
> 
> However, when I've added similar code to disable -m31 builds on
> s390x-ibm-linux systems where 31bit libraries are missing, gcc
> still did not build, because it still tried unsuccessfully to
> build a multilibbed libgcc_s.so.
> 
> Apparently, config-ml.in is not even used inside the gcc/ directory
> at all, only for the target libraries (libstdc++ etc.).
> 
> Is there some corresponding facility to disable multilibbed variants
> of libgcc if OS support is missing?

It would have to be written. Should probably go into mklibgcc.in.

	Jakub