This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Effect of -fno-reorder-blocks?


> > Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 15:23:08 -0500
> > From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com>
> 
> > > FWIW, I see only that change in the SPEC95 results.  Nothing
> > >
> > Since I'm not tracking mainline with the SPEC2000 runs I didn't
> > think they would interest you.  I can add it for tonight's run if
> > you'd like.
> 
> Thanks but I don't think that's necessary.  I think the SPEC95
> results are conclusive: the effect of -f(no-)reorder-blocks is
> minimal for this machine (PIII).
On the other hand, the spec2000 tester is P4 and knowing results there
might be interesting because of completely different machine.
Also in case the prboelm is really instruction cache trashing (I will
try to oprofile it), we probably won't see it on spec95 because it is
small.

Honza
> 
> brgds, H-P


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]