This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Assigning priorities to GNATS reports
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
- To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth at ticam dot utexas dot edu>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de" <reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de>
- Date: 14 Nov 2002 18:18:53 +0100
- Subject: Re: Assigning priorities to GNATS reports
- Organization: Integrable Solutions
- References: <38940000.1037293327@warlock.codesourcery.com>
Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:
[...]
| The point of that is that when we make the 3.3 release branch, the
| [3.3 regression] tags still make sense. If we decide a defect isn't
| important enough to fix, we'll either downgrade it from high, or,
| perhaps, change the tag to [3.4 regression], meaning fix it in that
| release. (That might be appropriate for something that can more
| easily be fixed once some functionality we expect in 3.4 will be
| present.)
I find this to be a sensible and more effective approach than we have
now. 100% supported.
-- Gaby