This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> If this is simple for you to check, can I please ask you to do a
> comparative SPECint{95, 2000} run with and without
> -fno-reorder-blocks together with whatever other flags you use
> with -O2, for main trunk and perhaps also the 3.2 branch? If
> not, I'll eventually do it myself for SPECint2000. I have a
> license. Maybe it has been done before, but I can't find any
> references.
>
Sure. I've added -fno-reorder-blocks to both SPEC2000 and SPEC95
runs. They should take effect in tonight's run (5:00 UTC).
> If not, can I please have a copy of the scripts used to simplify
> the SPEC setup and result comparison? (Perhaps they can be
> added to gcc/contrib/?)
>
Attached. The scripts can run both SPEC 95 and 2000. Let me
know if you need help setting things up.
I have no problem adding the files to gcc/contrib/. What's the
approval process? Just like any other patch?
Diego.
Attachment:
perf-scripts-20021112.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |