This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: state of 3.2.1-pre: how far from release?


Paul Jarc writes:

> My two cents: I'm not sure whether this is already covered by your
> description, but I'd suggest that, for example, an ICE on incorrect
> code should not be a blocker, even if it's a regression.

Agreed.  The main reason that the rules are the way they are is that,
for point releases (e.g. 3.2.1) the purpose is only to fix regressions,
not to add new code to implement things that have never worked before.
So we can fix ICEs, for example.  It should not be a promise that all
regressions will be fixed, just that it is OK to fix them if we have a
fix.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]