This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gcc-3.2 build problem in the java area

From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
To: tromey at redhat dot com
Cc: GCC Hackers <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 18:01:41 +0100 (BST)
Subject: Re: gcc-3.2 build problem in the java area
References: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0210101047230.21396-100000@obrien.cc.rochester.edu><15781.38525.112250.301901@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com><ylk7kphf29.fsf@windlord.stanford.edu><877kgpgd1y.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>

Tom Tromey writes:
 > >>>>> "Russ" == Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu> writes:
 > 
 > Russ> Solaris only defines MAXHOSTNAMELEN if:
 > Russ> #if !defined(_XPG4_2) || defined(__EXTENSIONS__)
 > 
 > Is there any drawback to simply always defining __EXTENSIONS__?
 > We could do that in include/posix.h.

But who might know what else __EXTENSIONS__ might do?  I suppose we
could "#ifdef __solaris" or somesuch.

It might be lees risky to "#ifdef __solaris .. #define MAXHOSTNAMELEN 256

Andrew.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gcc-3.2 build problem in the java area
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: gcc-3.2 build problem in the java area
  - From: Tom Tromey

References:
- gcc-3.2 build problem in the java area
  - From: cyan
- gcc-3.2 build problem in the java area
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: gcc-3.2 build problem in the java area
  - From: Russ Allbery
- Re: gcc-3.2 build problem in the java area
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]