This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: xfail gcc.dg test

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 15:00:40 -0700
Subject: Re: xfail gcc.dg test
References: <amodra@bigpond.net.au> <200210050224.WAA27004@makai.watson.ibm.com> <20021005203019.P25369@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au>

On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 08:30:19PM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> No, I'm not renaming the .text *section*, just sneakily renaming the
> .text section *symbol*.  Same for .data, .bss etc.

Please don't.  At present, one can use the section symbol and the
section name interchangably.  For _any_ section, not just those
predefined by the gABI.  Changing this would be extremely confusing.
Much much worse than differing the code symbol between xcoff and elf.

r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: xfail gcc.dg test
  - From: Alan Modra

References:
- Re: xfail gcc.dg test
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: xfail gcc.dg test
  - From: Alan Modra

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]