This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 10:45:31AM -0700, Janis Johnson wrote: > On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 06:11:49PM +0200, Robert Schiele wrote: > > Ok, again the systems on which I have built this version: > > Thanks! Your message and your test results are now linked from the > GCC 3.2 build status page at http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.2/buildstat.html. > > > > > // System 1: ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > > > > # config.guess > > i686-pc-linux-gnu > > I entered this one with the config.guess output, but just noticed that > it was built for i486, not i686, so I'll change that next time I update > the file. > > Do you have an opinion about whether the entry should be "suse" rather > than "unknown"? This is a new list so I can change the conventions a > bit from the other build status lists. I have no opinion about that, as I think it doesn't really matter whether this is built/run on a SuSE, RedHat, Debian or whatever system. In fact it doesn't matter, whether you set vendor to "suse", "redhat", "pc" or write a funny joke between the two dashes. ;-) Because of that your page is ok for me. The reason that "suse" is in the triple is just that I am using the compiler in our heterogeneous cluster build system which also uses some cross compilers and the SuSE provided binaries that are i486-suse-linux. Because of that I have configured the cluster to use i486-suse-linux for all ia32 linux systems to make things easier and to be able to use the SuSE binaries also. (Might be, it is also because of those funny T-shirts they send me from time to time. ;-) > > > // System 2: ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > > > > # config.guess > > sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu > > I entered this on as sparc-unknown-linux-gnu. Same question about > "suse" rather than "unknown". This is the same issue. It's just the cluster that is configured to use sparc-suse-linux for all sparc linux systems. Robert -- Robert Schiele Tel.: +49-621-181-2517 Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:rschiele@uni-mannheim.de
Attachment:
msg00917/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |