This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Request for Obsoletion: DWARF


>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:

> The *only* point in having DWARF support is for compatibility with vendor
> tools; GDB works find with DWARF2 or DBX.  But what vendor tools are out
> there that really want DWARF anymore?

I think there are still a number of compilers and debuggers in the embedded
space that use DWARF 1.1 with some C++ extensions that we haven't bothered
to implement.  I think the extensions originated at Metaware, but I don't
remember for sure.  We still periodically get people asking for DWARF 1
support.  We tell them no, but they do ask...:)

I would not object to re-disabling DWARF 1 for C++.

Jason


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]