This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: mips cc1 spec vs. fp reg defines vs. assembly code

From: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>
To: Eric Christopher <echristo at redhat dot com>
Cc: cgd at broadcom dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2002 21:19:23 +0100
Subject: Re: mips cc1 spec vs. fp reg defines vs. assembly code
References: <yov5660tcfaw.fsf@broadcom.com> <1023652668.13663.12.camel@ghostwheel.cygnus.com>

Eric Christopher wrote:-

> +      if (preprocessing_asm_p ())				\
> +	{							\
> +          builtin_define_std ("LANGUAGE_ASSEMBLY");		\
> +	  builtin_define_std ("_LANGUAGE_ASSEMBLY");		\
> +	}							\
> +      else if (c_language == clk_c)				\
> +	{							\
> +          builtin_define_std ("LANGUAGE_C");			\
> +	  builtin_define_std ("_LANGUAGE_C");			\

The _std's are not wanted for the 2 "_LANGUAGE" versions.

Neil.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: mips cc1 spec vs. fp reg defines vs. assembly code
  - From: Eric Christopher

References:
- mips cc1 spec vs. fp reg defines vs. assembly code
  - From: cgd
- Re: mips cc1 spec vs. fp reg defines vs. assembly code
  - From: Eric Christopher

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]