This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Sun, 2002-05-19 at 02:19, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > Jan Hubicka asked me last week to do this and yesterday evening I > started enhancing my scripts to visualize: > - the bootstrap time of GCC > - the build time for each SPEC program > I will probably be doing similar modifications to the SPEC95 tests. In the meantime I've done some quick grepping on the logs we have. I plotted three things: - SPECint95 build times from Mar/01 to May/02. - GCC bootstrap times (C front end) from Apr/01 to Sep/01. - GCC bootstrap times (C and F77 front ends) from Mar/02 to May/02. I have only included times for successful SPEC runs. The more consistent timings are for SPEC builds. I never consistently bootstrapped GCC (and for a period I bootstrapped with C and C++). Attached are the raw files I got from the logs in case somebody wants to do more analysis. The first column is the date, the second is the time in seconds. I plotted them and put the results in http://people.redhat.com/dnovillo/SPEC/build-times/ Bootstrap times don't seem to change significantly for the C front end. But, we seem to have gotten slower when bootstrapping both C and F77 starting in Apr/02. If I weren't such an optimist, I'd say that the SPECint build times are getting progressively worse. Diego.
Attachment:
c-bootstrap-times.dat
Description: MPEG movie
Attachment:
c-f77-bootstrap-times.dat
Description: MPEG movie
Attachment:
spec-build-time.dat
Description: MPEG movie
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |