This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Error report (gcc 3.1)

On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 11:33:14PM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Phil Edwards <phil@jaj.com> writes:
> 
> | On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 11:09:59PM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> | > Phil Edwards <phil@jaj.com> writes:
> | > | I agree wholeheartedly with the idea, but for the implementation, wouldn't
> | > | it be easier to just make --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs the default?
> | > 
> | > I'm unclear as to what you mean here. 
> | 
> | Try just building with that flag and see where the headers go (they get
> | installed more or less where Jakub suggests).  My suggestion is simply to
> | have that flag be turned on by default.
> 
> Aha, thanks.  But as I said in another message, people expect to find
> header files under ${prefix}/include.  We shouldn't depart from that.

Headers like <stddef.h>, <limits.h> etc. are already there, likewise all
fixincluded headers. I don't think this would be a big problem.

	Jakub
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]