This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC]

From: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>,Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>, Jim Blandy <jimb at redhat dot com>,gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 23:17:30 +0000
Subject: Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC]
References: <20020325234047.127345EA11@zwingli.cygnus.com> <20020326040735.GM23331@codesourcery.com> <20020326142901.B16366@redhat.com>

Richard Henderson wrote:-

> I think this is a mistake.  It is completely unreasonable to have
> the entire "major structural changes" time period concurrent with
> "please work on making a release happen".

I agree.  I think the releases should be an 8-month cycle rather
than a 6-month cycle.  In other words, 4 months for destabilizing
changes.

Neil.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC]
  - From: Tom Lord
- Re: gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC]
  - From: Zack Weinberg

References:
- sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC
  - From: Jim Blandy
- Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- gcc development schedule [Re: sharing libcpp between GDB and GCC]
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]