This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GNATS loosing bug reports?
- From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- To: Robert Schiele <rschiele at uni-mannheim dot de>
- Cc: gcc <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 11:53:34 +0100
- Subject: Re: GNATS loosing bug reports?
- References: <20020326100327.A5149@schiele.local>
- Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 10:03:28AM +0100, Robert Schiele wrote:
> The bug report I am talking about is at
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2002-03/msg00509.html.
>
> As this bug can be reproduced in an easy way on sparcv9, I would be
> happy to see this fixed before the 3.1 release.
I've reproduced your testcase even with the 2002-03-13 patch (before that
this behaviour would be "expected"), it looks like
some instruction has incorrect length attribute in the machine description
(gcc thinks the distance from branch to the label is 29953 insn while
in reality it is 33697 insns).
Will work on a fix.
Jakub