This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [Ada] Bootstrapping mainline GNAT fails (with workaround androot cause: makefile bug)


Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> writes:

|> Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> writes:
|> 
|> >> I'm not sure if anyone cares, but that's definitely a regression from GCC
|> >> 2.95.x.  I've been building GCC in a subdirectory of the source directory
|> >> for years.
|> >
|> > AFAIK A (new, empty) subdirectory of the source dir should work - what
|> > is not supported is building directly in the source dir.  If this is
|> > broken, it should get fixed,
|> 
|> install.texi reads:
|> 
|> | First, we @strong{highly} recommend that GCC be built into a
|> | separate directory than the sources which does @strong{not} reside
|> | within the source tree.  This is how we generally build GCC; building
|> | where @var{srcdir} == @var{objdir} should still work, but doesn't
|> | get extensive testing; building where @var{objdir} is a subdirectory
|> | of @var{srcdir} is unsupported.
|> 
|> That's why I didn't care about the breakage in the Ada run-time
|> library when OBJDIR is a subdirectory of SRCDIR.

If you apply my patch, it will work.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE GmbH, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]