This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: FW: Remaining Itanium exception, static linking patches
- From: Andrew Haley <aph at cambridge dot redhat dot com>
- To: "Boehm, Hans" <hans_boehm at hp dot com>
- Cc: "MOSBERGER, DAVID (HP-PaloAlto,unix3)" <davidm at hpl dot hp dot com>,"'rth at redhat dot com'" <rth at redhat dot com>,"'gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>,"'tromey at redhat dot com'" <tromey at redhat dot com>
- Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 12:09:39 +0000 (GMT)
- Subject: RE: FW: Remaining Itanium exception, static linking patches
- References: <40700B4C02ABD5119F000090278766443BF0DE@hplex1.hpl.hp.com>
Boehm, Hans writes:
> Andrew -
>
> After reconsidering this yet again, and in spite of David's objection, I
> would like to check in your Java signal/exception handling patch after all.
> Is your approval still good?
Okay, but the call to __libc_sigaction is rather evil.
At least we'll have something that works, although we'll need to
revisit this.
Do backtraces work in any reasonable way?
Andrew.