This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gcc.dg/cpp/charconst.c vs. WCHAR_TYPE "long int"

From: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>,Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 23:52:36 +0000
Subject: Re: gcc.dg/cpp/charconst.c vs. WCHAR_TYPE "long int"
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020322132948.040760b0@mail.lauterbach.com> <20020322234223.GA9477@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> <20020322154713.C7505@redhat.com>

Richard Henderson wrote:-

> On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 11:42:23PM +0000, Neil Booth wrote:
> > With my cross compiler it goes in as 506806141029
> > and comes out as 101 with overflow; it should be unchanged IMO.
> 
> Why?  5e11 _does_ overflow an int.

Hmmm, you're right.  Never mind.  I'll investigate further why I
don't have the same issue on x86.

Neil.

References:
- gcc.dg/cpp/charconst.c vs. WCHAR_TYPE "long int"
  - From: Franz Sirl
- Re: gcc.dg/cpp/charconst.c vs. WCHAR_TYPE "long int"
  - From: Neil Booth
- Re: gcc.dg/cpp/charconst.c vs. WCHAR_TYPE "long int"
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]