This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
question about LAPACK (integration test for 3.1 release criteria)
- From: Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 10:04:13 -0800
- Subject: question about LAPACK (integration test for 3.1 release criteria)
I ran LAPACK, from the list of integration tests from the gcc-3.1
criteria.html, on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu with GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.0.4.
They had the same results:
elm3a83% cd LAPACK/TESTING
elm3a83% fgrep -i fail *.out
cgd.out: CGV drivers: 59 out of 1092 tests failed to pass the threshold
csep.out: CST: 2 out of 4662 tests failed to pass the threshold
ded.out: DES: 2 out of 3264 tests failed to pass the threshold
ded.out: DSX: 2 out of 3494 tests failed to pass the threshold
dgd.out: DXV drivers: 200 out of 5000 tests failed to pass the threshold
dsep.out: DST drivers: 1 out of 14256 tests failed to pass the threshold
sgd.out: SXV drivers: 37 out of 5000 tests failed to pass the threshold
ssep.out: SST: 2 out of 4662 tests failed to pass the threshold
ssep.out: SST drivers: 1 out of 14256 tests failed to pass the threshold
zgd.out: ZGV drivers: 63 out of 1092 tests failed to pass the threshold
zgd.out: ZXV drivers: 24 out of 5000 tests failed to pass the threshold
I ran the timing tests and have the output files for 3.1 and 3.0.4. Is
there an easy way to compare times for the two compilers?
Janis