This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: why is the SC relevant (was Re: SC issues revised)
- From: dewar at gnat dot com (Robert Dewar)
- To: Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot com, lord at emf dot net
- Cc: bo at sonofthor dot dk, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, per at bothner dot com
- Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 21:38:10 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: why is the SC relevant (was Re: SC issues revised)
<<Sigh. We started egcs because we wanted a faster development cycle.
The SC-that-does-little was considered a feature, not a bug.
What does all this extra bureaucracy buy us? It seems to me to be
a step in the wrong direction.
>>
I agree this is a feature, "fixing" it would likely introduce a bug :-)