This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: patch for -Wno-long-long and early GNAT compilers
- From: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
- To: zack at codesourcery dot com
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 19 Mar 02 13:54:52 EST
- Subject: Re: patch for -Wno-long-long and early GNAT compilers
When raise.c is compiled by 2.8.1, it refers to __dummy. That symbol
was removed from libgcc.a in 3.0, so if ADAC is 2.8.1 and CC is 3.0,
unless we provide a definition, the link will fail.
Why do we want to support a different CC than ADAC? Why not just
use CC for everything and choose a CC that can compile Ada? I think we're
starting to go to a lot of trouble to support something that doesn't seem
to gain us anything except the potential for more trouble.
The install.texi change just adds "and the matching @file{cc1}" right
after "@file{gnat1}"; this is not obvious because the paragraph got
re-wrapped.
Right, the doc change is fine.