This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: profiling on sh
- From: mike stump <mrs at windriver dot com>
- To: mark at codesourcery dot com
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 13:04:30 -0800 (PST)
- Subject: Re: profiling on sh
> Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 23:26:07 -0800
> From: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
> To: mike stump <mrs@windriver.com>, "aoliva@redhat.com" <aoliva@redhat.com>
> cc: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
> I no longer remember the details here.
Luckily they are documented in the testcase you referenced in the cvs
checkin comment with the original work... Right? :-)
> I believe that someone (likely Jason or Benjamin) quoted something
> that suggested that it was safe to make this assumption, but that we
> never acted on that. If you file a PR, and send me email noting
> this performance regression, we'll get it resolved before 3.1.
Ok, here is the requested email, and the bug is c++/5998.