This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC build failed for native with your patch on 2002-03-16T11:00:03Z.
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- To: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>
- Cc: gcc-regression at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Geoff Keating <geoffk at cygnus dot com>
- Date: 16 Mar 2002 11:33:41 -0300
- Subject: Re: GCC build failed for native with your patch on 2002-03-16T11:00:03Z.
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <200203161319.g2GDJ7O28494@maat.cygnus.com><20020316135839.GB14388@daikokuya.demon.co.uk>
On Mar 16, 2002, Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> GCC regression checker wrote:-
>> With your recent patch, GCC does not compile on:
>> native
>> Attached is build output for those targets.
>>
>> The build failures are new.
> x/cvs-gcc/gcc/libjava/../libffi/include -I../libffi/include -fno-rtti -fnon-call-exceptions -fdollars-in-identifiers -D__NO_MATH_INLINES -ffloat-store -W -Wall -D_GNU_SOURCE -DPREFIX=\"/maat/heart/tbox/objs\" -g -O2 -D_GNU_SOURCE -Wp,-MD,.deps/prims.pp -c /maat/heart/tbox/cvs-gcc/gcc/libjava/prims.cc -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/prims.o
> cc1plus: unrecognized option `-MD'
> cc1plus: output filename specified twice
> Geoff, does this mean that the build machine has an out of date
> automake?
Nope, it means libjava still uses an outdated automake.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer