This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC 3.1 Issues
- From: Stan Shebs <shebs at apple dot com>
- To: Joel Sherrill <joel dot sherrill at OARcorp dot com>
- Cc: law at redhat dot com, David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 12:26:58 -0800
- Subject: Re: GCC 3.1 Issues
- References: <7138.1015531959@porcupine.cygnus.com> <3C87CAA9.324B47F4@OARcorp.com>
Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> law@redhat.com wrote:
> >
> > In message <200203072002.PAA27142@makai.watson.ibm.com>, David Edelsohn writes:
> > > arc-elf
> > > avr-elf
> > > d30v-elf
> > > fr30-elf
> > > mcore-elf
> > > mn10200-elf
> > > v850-elf
> > >
> > > Are these targets ever built in any other configuration? In other words,
> > > are the failures ELF-specific for those targets or those targets simply
> > > have not been maintained in GCC-3?
> > I'm pretty sure the d30, fr30, mn10200 and v850 are all ELF only.
>
> I don't think they are ELF specific. Each appears to be target
> specific and a sign of not being maintained. We had hoped for
> better embedded target support in 3.1 than 3.0 which is why I
> am mentioning these.
Can we *please* retire the d30v, or at least take it off the
try-to-compile list? I don't know of any evidence that the
chip ever even taped out, let alone got used by anybody.
> I didn't think it worth mentioning but the a29k-coff
> doesn't compile either.
In case people don't know, the a29k has recently gone onto
GDB's obsolete list. Even AMD now disavows any rumors of
possible association with this architecture... 1/2 :-)
Stan