This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Bootstrap failures with today's CVS
On Sun, Nov 18, 2001 at 03:54:53PM -0500, Jeff Sturm wrote:
>
> Is there any reason, besides history, that the top-level include isn't
> libiberty/include?
By now I would guess it's mostly history, but over in /cvs/src the top
level include directory has a whole bunch more stuff:
MAINTAINERS callback.h fopen-bin.h ieee.h os9k.h
alloca-conf.h coff/ fopen-same.h mpw/ progress.h
aout/ dis-asm.h fopen-vms.h nlm/ regs/
bfdlink.h elf/ gdbm.h oasys.h remote-sim.h
bin-bugs.h filenames.h hp-symtab.h opcode/ sim-d10v.h
bout.h
Most of this appears to be BFD-related headers shared between various
directories. In general the way libbfd and its consumers are laid out
confuses me. For instance, the other week it took me about fifteen
minutes of hunting to discover that half of the machine-specific code
for GAS is in gas/config, and the other half is in include/opcode.
zw