This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC 3.0.3 and GCC 3.1

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
To: cgd at broadcom dot com
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 13:04:42 -0500
Subject: Re: GCC 3.0.3 and GCC 3.1
References: <80450000.1005974208@warlock.codesourcery.com> <20011117005255.A3269@nevyn.them.org> <mailpost.1005976409.6906@postal.sibyte.com> <yov56688ikmq.fsf@broadcom.com>

On Sat, Nov 17, 2001 at 11:49:33PM -0800, cgd@broadcom.com wrote:
> drow@mvista.com ("Daniel Jacobowitz") writes:
> > As of 3.0.1, and it does not appear to be fixed in 3.0.2, a
> > cross-compiler can not build a multilibbed libstdc++.
> 
> shared, or not shared?

Shared.

> (AFAICT, 3.0.1, at least cross-compiling for a mips64-elf-ish target
> with very minor local configury hacks, seems capable of building a
> multilibbed set of .a's for libstdc++-v3...)

SH worked around this:

#ifdef NO_SHARED_LIBGCC_MULTILIB
                            "-lgcc_s"
#else
                            "-lgcc_s%M"
#endif

The mklibgcc magic to build these is apparently not working.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GCC 3.0.3 and GCC 3.1
  - From: Craig Rodrigues

References:
- GCC 3.0.3 and GCC 3.1
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: GCC 3.0.3 and GCC 3.1
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: GCC 3.0.3 and GCC 3.1
  - From: cgd

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]