This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: numerical instability and estimate-probability

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
Cc: mike stump <mrs at windriver dot com>, gcc-pdo at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, jh at suse dot cz
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 10:01:26 -0800
Subject: Re: numerical instability and estimate-probability
References: <200111151931.LAA05450@kankakee.wrs.com> <20011115173903.B8223@redhat.com> <orhersgr78.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>

On Sun, Nov 18, 2001 at 11:10:35AM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> Err...  I seem to remember having read somewhere, perhaps in the GCC
> manual, that it would evaluate arguments in the same order, despite
> the freedom granted by the standards, even though no sequence point
> would be introduced between the evaluation of the arguments.

I don't remember ever seeing this.  And if it is in our docs
somewhere it should be eliminated with predjudice.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: numerical instability and estimate-probability
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

References:
- Re: numerical instability and estimate-probability
  - From: mike stump
- Re: numerical instability and estimate-probability
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: numerical instability and estimate-probability
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]