This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Bootstrapping gcc-3.0.2-branch on k6 and testresults
- To: <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Subject: Bootstrapping gcc-3.0.2-branch on k6 and testresults
- From: Gcc testing account <caligula at cam029208 dot student dot utwente dot nl>
- Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 02:45:58 +0200 (CEST)
Ave gcc-developers.
Since about a week gcc-3.0.2-branch bootstraps again for my k6.
I made a bootstrap-lean,make check cycle and posted the results to the
gcc-testresults mailing list. The results were posted under the name mu.
I used a slightly enhanced gcc_build to fetch/configure/make and check
gcc.
Now I've got the following questions about this.
1) I configured gcc with host and target k6-redhat-linux-gnu. However
test_summary gives as native configuration i586-redhat-linux-gnu.
When I'm doing "make check" am I really testing gcc for a k6,or am I
testing for i586?
2)If I'm testing the right stuff (k6),do you developers find it usefull
that I'm keeping sending those results to the gcc-testresults mailing
list? There are already a lot of i586/i686 testresults.
3)If so. What's an appropiate frequency. Now I'm doing the
bootstrap/check cycle everyday. One day gcc-head,the other day gcc-3.0.x-branch.
Is posting al these results too much or is one testresults posting a week
enough?
Since the release is not far away I'm thinking about gcc-3.0.x-branch
everyday until release and then one testresult per branch a week.
Greetings Martijn
(please reply to the list only cause I'cant receive mail on this
account yet. I follow the list on the archives at gcc.gnu.org)