This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine)
- To: aoliva at redhat dot com, dewar at gnat dot com
- Subject: Re: What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine)
- From: dewar at gnat dot com
- Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 21:01:52 -0400 (EDT)
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, moshier at moshier dot ne dot mediaone dot net,neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk, torvalds at transmeta dot com,tprince at computer dot org
<<I'd much rather write ((a*b)) + ((a*c)), which will even compile with
other compilers, and might be picked up in a future revision of the C
and C++ Standards.
>>
I very much doubt that the standards committee would even consider, let
alone adopt such a lexically dubious extension :-)