This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine)
- To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: What is acceptable for -ffast-math? (Was: associative law in combine)
- From: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 23:45:18 +0100
- Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds at transmeta dot com>, dewar at gnat dot com,moshier at moshier dot ne dot mediaone dot net, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org,tprince at computer dot org
Alexandre Oliva wrote:-
> But we could use new tokens, say (( )) and ((( ))) to mark expressions
> the preprocessor and the compiler shouldn't muck up with.
You can't be serious? Any non-trivial CPP expansion tends to have
multiple redundant parentheses all over the place.
Neil.