This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: INSN_CODE_NUMBER of INT_MAX
- To: rth at redhat dot com
- Subject: Re: INSN_CODE_NUMBER of INT_MAX
- From: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 01 13:18:11 EDT
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
> I think this is a very bad idea: why not use the natural INSN_CODE
> for such moves?
There may not be one. We accept unrecognizable insns here.
Then how do we protect against extract_insn failing?