This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: C++ compile-time regressions (was: GCC 3.0.1 Status Report)
- To: law at redhat dot com
- Subject: Re: C++ compile-time regressions (was: GCC 3.0.1 Status Report)
- From: Daniel Berlin <dan at cgsoftware dot com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 16:14:03 -0400
- cc: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot com>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- References: <19266.995917989@localhost.localdomain>
--On Monday, July 23, 2001 1:53 PM -0600 law@redhat.com wrote:
> In message <877kwzearp.fsf@cgsoftware.com>you write:
> > Past that, e very other compiler i know of started using region based
> compi > ling
> > (HP's ELCOR, SGI Pro64, SGI's mipspro, Intel's compilers,
> > IBM's compilers, etc) in order to cut down the compile time while
> speeding > up the code.
> I know that SGI's compiler doesn't actually do region stuff. They ran
> into a rats nest of problems with the actual implementation.
>
Err, the source code for pro64 has it in there, and at O2 and O3, it
certainly goes through that code, and appears to create regions/use them.
Maybe this wasn't done in time for mipspro.
> jeff