This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: C++ compile-time regressions (was: GCC 3.0.1 Status Report)
- To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- Subject: Re: C++ compile-time regressions (was: GCC 3.0.1 Status Report)
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 10:35:35 -0700
- cc: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
> Well, here I have to step up again, I'm afraid. If you look at
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-07/msg01376.html
> you'll see that C++ projects heavily relying on STL apparently
> simply cannot use GCC 3.0.
An extreme statement, but, that aside, as you know people are working
on fixes. The point is that 3.0.1 is better than 3.0; that is good.
Ideally, it would be better, but the point is to make consistent
progress.
--
Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com