This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: associative law in combine
- To: Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Re: associative law in combine
- From: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 21:21:25 +0200
- References: <20010716224423.F29145@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <3B547DF4.7F39BF61@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> <20010717200629.E5166@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <3B5489F1.54DE59CE@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> <20010717205837.I5166@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <3B548CBF.DDD59F97@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> <20010717211516.N5166@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <3B548FAA.E174E765@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>
> Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
> > > Sure, but not in fold-CONST.c :-)
> > OK, what is the apropriate place for that then? We simply need it to be done
> > at tree level. It is FOLD-const after all :)
>
> Unfortunately, I don't know.
>
> Perhaps just asking it on the list is best.
OK, so to speak loud - where is the proper place to convert
a/b/c to a/(b*c) at tree level. fold-const or some other?
Honza