This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: pedantic: not fussing enough?
I think it will take some discussion until any of these observations could
be said to be a bug.
Perhaps this is not the right list for this kind of discussion anyway.
Please give me advice.
Thank you,
Carlos
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
To: "Carlos Pita" <cpitaar@yahoo.com.ar>
Cc: <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 4:40 AM
Subject: Re: pedantic: not fussing enough?
On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Carlos Pita wrote:
> I'm studying the ISO C++ standard in some detail. While I´m reading it I
> use to compile some tests using g++ (3.0) with the -pedantic command line
> option and to compare the actual results (reports) against the ones
required
> by the statements in the standard. I think it would be helpful to post any
> possible violations to the standard I could find (except, of course, for
> rules for which no diagnostic is required, which would not be a
violation).
> If you don't find it useful please say it to me.
Bug reports should go to our GNATS bug tracking database, one PR per
issue, unless the C++ maintainers think some other method would be more
useful. Anything just sent to the mailing lists is likely to be forgotten
unless someone decides to act on it immediately.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com