This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Beyond GCC 3.0: Summing Up

To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Subject: Re: Beyond GCC 3.0: Summing Up
From: Phil Edwards <pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 03:19:03 -0400
Cc: Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
References: <m2sng5qqo6.fsf@kelso.bothner.com> <337540000.994743670@warlock.codesourcery.com>

On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 10:41:10PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> It might be that we should require a pair of people authorize any
> reversion; that would make sure that a rabid anti-regressionist had
> to find an ally before running amok.

Checks and balances?  This problem has been solved before, after all.  :-)

Perhaps we can adopt some of the "on the hook" policies used by Mozilla,
or at least bring them up for a starting point in discussion.  I found
the Tinderbox concept (linked to from the beginner's projects page)
quite appealing.

Phil

-- 
Would I had phrases that are not known, utterances that are strange, in
new language that has not been used, free from repetition, not an utterance
which has grown stale, which men of old have spoken.
                                     - anonymous Egyptian scribe, c.1700 BC

References:
- Re: Beyond GCC 3.0: Summing Up
  - From: Per Bothner
- Re: Beyond GCC 3.0: Summing Up
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]