This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [GCC 3.0] Bad regression, binary size



On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, Richard Henderson wrote:
>
> That said, for the newest processors, P4, Athlon, and x86-64,
> it's a win to allocate all of the outgoing argument space in
> the prologue and use mov instaed of push.  At which point keeping
> the stack aligned takes zero extra instructions.

Hmm. It's obviously not true at least for one case: functions that do not
need a frame and that call other functions without arguments. But at that
point it might not matter any more.

		Linus


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]