This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Experiences using struct gcc_target
- To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
- Subject: Re: Experiences using struct gcc_target
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2001 12:26:36 -0700
- cc: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>, Stan Shebs <shebs at apple dot com>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
--On Thursday, July 05, 2001 09:51:58 AM -0300 Alexandre Oliva
<aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Jul 5, 2001, "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>> Similarly, you should make it declare union tree_node; and use union
>> tree_node * instead of tree. (But the documentation should still use
>> "tree" and "rtx" when it documents the hooks with @deftypefn.)
>
> Perhaps we should have alternate headers akin to C++'s <iosfwd> that
> #defined rtx and tree (or just `typedef'ed them) without actually
> defining the underlying types.
Yes.
--
Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com