This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC 3.0.1 Status
- To: Mumit Khan <khan at NanoTech dot Wisc dot EDU>
- Subject: Re: GCC 3.0.1 Status
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2001 12:54:14 -0700
- cc: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
--On Tuesday, July 03, 2001 03:09:38 PM -0500 Mumit Khan
<khan@NanoTech.Wisc.EDU> wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Mark Mitchell wrote:
>
>> Kick it back up to high priority.
>>
>> The current thinking is to use "high" to indicate "regression", rather
>> than "must be fixed in next release". Obviously, we would like those
>> two things to coincide, but it is not always possible.
>
> How do I go about marking PRs c++/3394 and c++/3395, both regressions
> against 2.95.x, high priority?
If you have GNATS write access, just do it. Otherwise, ask me to
do it for you, offlist.
Thanks,
--
Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com